In the CAPS program, officers in all districts and on all beats were instructed to work with neighborhood residents to identify chronic local crime problems and to devise solutions for them. The views of the local residents were expressed through district-level advisory committees and monthly public meetings. To evaluate the program, Skogan et al. The evaluation used a quasi-experimental design based on the differential changes in views and experience of two groups over time.
Implementation[ edit ] The CAPS Implementation Office was created and staffed by civilian community outreach workers who organized court advocacy programs and coordinated city services in support of CAPS related programs. The implementation includes five strategies: Other features of the implementation strategy include support from other government agencies, enhanced training, computerized crime analysis, updated marketing and communications techniques, stricter and more quantitative evaluation metrics, and long-term strategic planning.
Between andmost of the police force in Chicago in addition to 10, civilians received training to aid their ability to recognize hotbeds of crime and understand how such areas come to be in an effort to prevent The chicago alternative policing strategy from arising.
Identify the issues in the community and decide an order of addressing each, Analyze available information on the issue at hand, Design out of the box solutions with preventative stress, Implement the solutions while coordinating with the respective city offices as well as the community and Evaluate effectiveness.
This problem-solving method was supplemented in Chicago by re-design within the Chicago police department, such as a complete restructuring of the system and a more teamwork friendly hierarchy.
Chicago was split into beats, or The chicago alternative policing strategy, with roughly 8—10 officers assigned to each beat. This forced the city to hire more officers, ensuring that the force was not short-staffed, and that trust between the officers and communities was not completely severed.
Increased rapid response teams unattached to a specific beat combined with improved methods of communication and technology allowed for a more efficient strategy. Beats that were closest to the goal tended to be more high-activity areas although, in those same areas, officers found it difficult to keep up with all activity.
Individuals became involved by attending local beat meetings. Meetings generally take place monthly at a regular time and are generally held in a community area, such as a church, park or school.
A CAPS facilitator runs the meetings, running the meeting according to an agenda and calling on community members to ask questions. The police are active members and play a major role in all discussions. Another major component of meetings is the special role played by a small group of dedicated beat meeting activists.
These activists come to meetings frequently in their beats, driving up attendance and CAPS related activism. CAPS related activism includes marches, rallies, prayer vigils, and smoke-outs group barbecue at gang or drug-infested sites.
Community members who attend the meeting have the chance to ask questions and voice concerns about crime-related problems in their neighborhood, hear reports by the police on crime activity in their beat, and meet neighbors who are also concerned about the safety of their community.
Attendance is generally higher where it is needed. The beat meetings where attendance is the highest are usually areas with bad housing, high levels of crime, and poor schools. Citizen awareness of CAPS has increased over time, but several studies have found that awareness is highest among African American residents of Chicago.
Church involvement showed a high correlation with CAPS involvement as well; one explanation proposed for this is many CAPS meetings are held in churches, especially in African American communities where both CAPS and church involvement are particularly strong. Additionally, the police coordinated with other city agencies regarding graffiti removal and abandoned car removal, as residents expressed those two issues as major frustrations within their communities.
New crime-mapping software was developed to encourage the routine distribution of crime-related data to both the public and those who regularly attended beat meetings. Specific task forces were created to enforce anti-gang and anti-drug house ordinances throughout the city. The Chicago Police Department collaborated with building, health, and fire inspectors to ensure that any identified drug houses were kept under control and within the city building codes.
Additionally, local prosecutors and county attorneys placed a greater emphasis on cooperation with the CAPS in order to prevent reoccurring offenses. Beats are small geographic areas to which police officers are assigned. Rather than changing beat officers daily, CAPS assigns the same officers to a particular beat for at least one year in order to encourage partnerships and problem-solving at the beat level, and to allow officers to develop relationships within the neighborhoods in which they work.
The Office of Emergency Management and Communication OEMC  dispatchers use a call priority matrix, often assigning the "nearest police unit" to respond to calls. These rapid response officers still use the traditional methods for emergencies and rapid response, and are able to take most of the emergency calls in their sectors, which are groupings of three to five beats.
Aside from responding to emergency calls, the rapid response officers were put in place to not only provide backup to beat officers who may be assisting the community elsewhere, but to help each beat officer maintain a solid presence in his or her respective beats. Individual residents meet with their beat officers and other police personnel to discuss neighborhood problems and hopefully develop strategies to address them.
Beyond the community, CAPS heavily relies on city agencies and services to prevent crime.
CAPS has no underlying criminology theory as its basis, and no rigorous academic studies have shown CAPS as an entirely effective or efficient anti-crime tool. The goal of the DAC is to discuss district priorities and develop district-wide strategies with community resources. A Northwestern University report, Caps at Ten, claimed that many members were frustrated with their ill-defined mandates, leadership problems, and inaction.
City officials reported that, as ofboth violent crime and property crime dropped in each of the 25 police districts.The Chicago Alternative Policing Strategy or CAPS, consists of the entire community and police department together rather than special departments. Chicago created this program so that officers are assigned to designated neighborhoods as their permanent assigned areas.
Chicago Alternative Policing Strategy (CAPS) is a community driven policing strategy designed for the Chicago Police Department that aims to bridge the gap between the police force and the citizens of .
The Chicago Alternative Policing Strategy (CAPS) meeting for Beat on Wednesday, March 14, featured new Chicago Police Department 9th District Commander Randall Darlin, who introduced himself, outlined future policing strategies for the neighborhood and touched on recent crime incidents, including the robbery and shooting the afternoon of Tuesday, March 12, at West 36th Street and South.
Chicago Alternative Policing Strategies Katie Miller August 3, AJS/ Donald Savell University of Phoenix CAPS Community policing is a collaborated effort between the police, community agencies and the people living in the community to identify and solve community problems.
Chicago Alternative Policing Strategy A year later, the Chicago Police Department implemented CAPS all across Chicago.
The goal of CAPS was to blend traditional policing strategies with alternative strategies aimed at encouraging community members and police to work together to reduce the occurrence of crimes.
Other models important to problem-oriented policing include the problem analysis triangle, which focuses on identifying the actual problem, and the Chicago Alternative Policing Strategy (CAPS) model, which is a 5 step problem-solving model similar to SARA.